9/11 Science

The 9/11 Consensus Points

Factual Evidence Contradicts the 9/11 Story

The official account of the events of September 11, 2001, has been used:

  • to justify the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, which have resulted in the deaths of over a million people; [1]
  • to authorize torture, military tribunals, and extraordinary rendition; and
  • to suspend freedoms guaranteed by the American Constitution such as habeas corpus in the USA, and similar freedoms in Canada, the UK, and other countries.

The official claims regarding 9/11 are contradicted by facts that have been validated by a scientific consensus process, and which include the following points of “best evidence”.

The 50 Consensus Points are divided into the ten categories below, which in turn link to the individual 50 points:

A. General Consensus Points
B. Consensus Points about the Twin Towers
C. Consensus Points about the Collapse of World Trade Center 7
D. Consensus Points about the Pentagon
E. Consensus Points about the 9/11 Flights
F. Consensus Points about US Military Exercises On and Before 9/11
G. Consensus Points about the Political and Military Commands on 9/11
H. Consensus Points about Hijackers on 9/11
I. Consensus Points about the Phone Calls on 9/11
V. Consensus Points about Official Video Exhibits Regarding 9/11

(Read More at Consensus 9/11…)