AA911.org includes links to a wide variety of 9/11 related articles, books, films, videos, quotes, awesbites and other rearch tools. Newcomers to alternative views on 9/11 will find an eye-opening array of new information to explore. Experienced 9/11 researchers may discover fruitful new avenues of exploration. Scroll down to view samples of each link category. Or, click links in the list below to find more articles, book, filmes, etc…
The Official Story of the Collapse of WTC Building 7 Lies in Ruins
By Paul Craig Roberts | Sep 6, 2019
A research team at the University of Alaska’s engineering department has concluded that fire did not cause the collapse of WTC 7 on 9/11.
A research team at the University of Alaska’s Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, led by Dr. Leroy Hulsey, Dr. Zhili Quan, and Professor Feng Xiao, Department of Civil Engineering, Nanjing University of Science and Technology, released on September 3, 2019, for public comment their findings from a four-year study of the collapse of World Trade Center Building 7 on September 11, 2001. This is the first scientific investigation of the collapse of the building. Here is the conclusion:
“The principal conclusion of our study is that fire did not cause the collapse of WTC 7 on 9/11, contrary to the conclusions of NIST and private engineering firms that studied the collapse. The secondary conclusion of our study is that the collapse of WTC 7 was a global failure involving the near-simultaneous failure of every column in the building.”
Notice three things: (1) it has taken 18 years to get a real investigation of the destruction of a building blamed on Muslim terrorists, (2) the only way “near-simultaneous failure of every column in the building” can occur is through controlled demolition, and (3) this remarkable finding is not reported in the presstitute media.
This article was originally published at PaulCraigRoberts.org on September 4, 2019.
9/11 Unmasked: An International Review Panel Investigation
From the Back Cover
A panel of experts highlight the problems with all major claims of the official account of the 9/11 attacks.
Many Americans have been embarrassed by the Trump presidency. But Americans should also be embarrassed by the fact that this country’s foreign policy since 2001, which has resulted in millions of deaths, has been based on a complex deception.
9/11 Unmasked is the result of a six-year investigation by an international review panel, which has provided 51 points illustrating the problematic status of all the major claims in the official account of the 9/11 attacks, some of which are obviously false. Most dramatically, the official account of the destruction of the Twin Towers and World Trade Center 7 could not possibly be true, unless the laws of physics were suspended that day. But other claims made by the official account including the claims that the 9/11 planes were taken over by al-Qaeda hijackers, that one of those hijackers flew his plane into the Pentagon, and that passengers on the planes telephoned people on the ground are also demonstrably false.
Two years ago Hollywood sound editor Charles Ewing Smith revisited the unused footage of the psychology professionals whose interviews appear at the end of the documentary 9/11: Explosive Evidence — Experts Speak Out (ESO).
Having been co-executive producer and co-editor of that film, Smith was already well acquainted with the footage. As he replayed the extensive comments that had been cut, he found in these social scientists’ voices a compelling message that he felt needed to be shared with the world.
So in January 2015 he began a personal quest to make a documentary that would capture the essence of their insights. His vision became a reality last year. The Demolition of Truth: Psychologists Examine 9/11 was completed in July 2016 and was subsequently made into a DVD, which is now available in the AE911Truth store.
“Whoever is responsible for bringing to grizzly fruition this new false-flag operation,
which has been used to justify the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq as well as
unprecedented assaults on research, education, and civil liberties, must be perversely proud of their efficient handiwork…I suggest that those of us
aware and concerned demand that the glaringly erroneous official account of 9/11 be dismissed as a fraud and a new, thorough, and impartial investigation be undertaken.” – Dr. Lynn Margulis, distinguished professor of geosciences at the University of Massachusetts, recipient of the National Medal of Science and other awards